Theorema Undecimus Indecium

Taking our image of microscopic "cellular" space, we began "indexing" this image and zooming out through the use of our image program.
As one "zooms out" and increases the scale of the spatial dimensions, one can begin to see the virtual disappearance of the mysterious dimenstions due to loss of resolution.







Until, finally, no further loss of resolution is possible and the mysterious dimensions are "lost" due to the scaling up of space.

Theorema Undecimus (Finally)

THEOREMA UNDECIMUS

The idea for this theorem (hypothesis, really) came to me on the evening of November 11th, 2006 and considers the eleven "mysterious" dimensions "discovered" by the all-but disfavored "String Theory". The editors have no particular adherence to "String Theory", but are very concerned with the shape of space. Particularly, microscopic or "quantum space".(As usual, we are having problems with Blogger posting any images. The degree of difficulty to even logging onto Blogger has become problematic, even diabolical).

The first image depicted here is an illumination of a bitmap image of a subatomic particle, depicted in eleven dimensions. It is, of course, impossible to depict a real particle with something as crude as a 2-dimensional bitmap canvas.The zeroth dimension was not labelled as it would be quite impossible in this depiction. Neither is the 1st dimension, as the linear dimension is obvious and might actually cause confusion later.Remember that this is a sub-atomic particle being depicted and the sub-atomic space it also occupies or (if correct) creates, distorts, etc.

Dimensions 2 and 3 depict the obvious macroscopic dimensions that we're accustomed to.Dimensions 4, 5 and 6 are "wrapped" around the particle and are "observable" only in the sub-atomic dimension.

Dimensions 7 and 8 describe the spin-direction dimensions of the sub-atomic particle and/or space.

Dimensions 9 and 10 describe the "hidden" spatial dimensions contained inside dimensions 4, 5 and 6.

Dimension 11 describes the space surrounding all the other dimensions, which is timelike.

But, how to prove any of this? We are wracking our brains trying to crack this one....sorry, eleven.Is macroscopic space definded by the interactions of microscopic cells defined by the previous description of a subatomic particle/space?

Is macroscopic space defined by the interactions of these proposed microscopic "cells' defined by the previous description of a subatomic particle? (See above image). Is macroscopic space built-up in this way by microscopic space? Do Planck dimensions have an effect on larger spatial dimensions, including the elucidation of time and timelike curvature in spatial dimensions?

And further still, do the "mysterious" dimensions then "cancel out" and disappear into the known dimensions of space and time (see image below)? Is this how the large scale structure of reality is created?

Deletion of Theorema Undecimus

We have had to delete our most recent posting on Blogger due to persistent and insoluble posting and editing problems experienced with Blogger. We have tried to contact the Blogger personnel without success. This has been a serious waste of our valuable time and resources.

Theorema Undecimus

THEOREMA UNDECIMUS

The idea for this theorem (hypothesis, really) came to me on the evening of November 11th, 2006 and considers the eleven "mysterious" dimensions "discovered" by the all-but discarded "String Theory". The editors have no particular adherence to "String Theory", but are very concerned with the shape of space. Particularly, microscopic or "quantum space".

(As usual, we are having problems with Blogger posting any images. The degree of difficulty to even logging onto Blogger has become problematic, even diabolical).

The image to be depicted here was an illumination of a bitmap image of a subatomic particle, depicted in eleven dimensions. It is, of course, impossible to depict a real particle with something as crude as a 2-dimensional bitmap canvas.

The zeroth dimensions was not labelled as it would be quite impossible in this depiction. Neither is the 1st dimension, as the linear dimension is obvious and might actually cause confusion later.

Remember that this is a sub-atomic particle being depicted and the sub-atomic space it also occupies or (if correct) creates, distorts, etc.

Dimensions 2 and 3 depict the obvious macroscopic dimensions that we're accustomed to.

Dimensions 4, 5 and 6 are "wrapped" around the particle and are "observable" only in the sub-atomic dimension.

Dimensions 7 and 8 describe the spin-direction dimensions of the sub-atomic particle and/or space.

Dimensions 9 and 10 describe the "hidden" spatial dimensions contained inside dimensions 4, 5 and 6.

Dimension 11 describes the space surrounding all the other dimensions, which is timelike.

Blogger image of this graphic is to the left? Can't see it? Contact Google - don't even bother trying to contact Blogger.


But, how to prove any of this? We are wracking our brains trying to crack this one....sorry, eleven.

Is macroscopic space definded by the interactions of microscopic cells defined by the previous description of a subatomic particle/space?



(A graphic was to be inserted here, but again, we are anticipating Blogger problems and will attempt to post it%2