Monday, November 13, 2006

Theorema Undecimus




THEOREMA UNDECIMUS

The idea for this theorem (hypothesis, really) came to me on the evening of November 11th, 2006 and considers the eleven "mysterious" dimensions "discovered" by the all-but discarded "String Theory". The editors have no particular adherence to "String Theory", but are very concerned with the shape of space. Particularly, microscopic or "quantum space".

(As usual, we are having problems with Blogger posting any images. The degree of difficulty to even logging onto Blogger has become problematic, even diabolical).

The image to be depicted here was an illumination of a bitmap image of a subatomic particle, depicted in eleven dimensions. It is, of course, impossible to depict a real particle with something as crude as a 2-dimensional bitmap canvas.

The zeroth dimensions was not labelled as it would be quite impossible in this depiction. Neither is the 1st dimension, as the linear dimension is obvious and might actually cause confusion later.

Remember that this is a sub-atomic particle being depicted and the sub-atomic space it also occupies or (if correct) creates, distorts, etc.

Dimensions 2 and 3 depict the obvious macroscopic dimensions that we're accustomed to.

Dimensions 4, 5 and 6 are "wrapped" around the particle and are "observable" only in the sub-atomic dimension.

Dimensions 7 and 8 describe the spin-direction dimensions of the sub-atomic particle and/or space.

Dimensions 9 and 10 describe the "hidden" spatial dimensions contained inside dimensions 4, 5 and 6.

Dimension 11 describes the space surrounding all the other dimensions, which is timelike.

Blogger image of this graphic is to the left? Can't see it? Contact Google - don't even bother trying to contact Blogger.


But, how to prove any of this? We are wracking our brains trying to crack this one....sorry, eleven.

Is macroscopic space definded by the interactions of microscopic cells defined by the previous description of a subatomic particle/space?



(A graphic was to be inserted here, but again, we are anticipating Blogger problems and will attempt to post it%2



No comments: